tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8585732092994259978.post1128112898020555025..comments2024-02-26T19:22:15.069-06:00Comments on Lex Christianorum: Terrorism an Intrinsic EvilAndrew M. Greenwellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17242573723573203387noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8585732092994259978.post-44316588127041337372012-05-12T15:28:33.385-05:002012-05-12T15:28:33.385-05:00is one of the most brutal forms of violence trauma...<i>is one of the most brutal forms of violence traumatizing the international community today,</i><br /><br />Here we go with this ""international community"". There is no such thing as an "international community". Community exists among things of likeness. The Natural Law is the Law of similitude, . The underpinning of any community is simularity. There is no such thing as an "international communty". That is an oxymoron because there is so much disimularity there can't be a "community". Moreover, this presupposes racelessness.W.LindsayWheelerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06236577164127792348noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8585732092994259978.post-4944388911128459172012-05-12T14:33:51.677-05:002012-05-12T14:33:51.677-05:00TERRORISM IS AN OFFENSE AGAINST GOD AND MAN.
I do...<i>TERRORISM IS AN OFFENSE AGAINST GOD AND MAN.</i><br /><br />I don't agree. The term "terrorism" is a modern word. And of course, you make mention of Muslims. Can't you do some history. Could you not say that the American Indian and their war against Europeans was Terrorism? Massacring and butchering civilians? If I think back thru history, wasn't the first leaders of modern terrorism though leftist ideologues? Were they not communists? Who set off the bombs in Tsarist Russia? Who assinated the Christian leaders of Russia? Why no mention of this in your article?<br /><br />If we look in Classical Antiquity we may see that it was the Scirarii that went around terrorizing their own populace cleansing it of traitors. The historical and preponderance of terrorism is NON-Muslim. So why are you picking on the Muslims for?<br /><br />Terrorism from Muslims ONLY occured in either the French occupation of Algeria or the British occupation of the Jordan. If there was no State of Israel, would there be huge amounts of Muslim terrorism?<br /><br />Isn't terrorism performed when there is a disproportion in the forces involved. The American Indian contra the European, the Scirarii contra the Greeks/Hellenizers, the Algerian contra French Forces, Jewish communists contra the Tsarist Regime, Communist agitators contra Reactionaries, Tamil rebels against Indonesian government forces. In all these cases the forces are unequal. <br /><br />Unequalness leads to what military experts call asymmetric warfare. It is just common sense! In order to overthrow a much powerful opponent, stealth and terror must be used. There is NO other way to conduct war. Asymmetrical warfare is the natural consequence of unequal ability to counter overwhelming technological and/or numerical superiority. <br /><br />Life is War. And common sense leads opponents of the status quo to engage in asymmetrical warfare. It is a logical consequence to massive superiorty.<br /><br />Terrorism is much a leftist phenomena more than it is Muslim. Before the State of Israel, a big part of terrorism was carried out by Jews. So why pick on the Muslims. <br /><br />There is No guarantee in life. You are NOT guaranteed a "fullness of life". That is not what Life is.W.LindsayWheelerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06236577164127792348noreply@blogger.com